=?utf-8?q?Donát?= Nagy <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/[email protected]>


================
@@ -42,8 +42,14 @@ namespace {
 class VirtualCallChecker
     : public Checker<check::BeginFunction, check::EndFunction, check::PreCall> 
{
 public:
-  // These are going to be null if the respective check is disabled.
-  mutable std::unique_ptr<BugType> BT_Pure, BT_Impure;
+  enum : CheckerPartIdx { PureChecker, ImpureChecker, NumCheckerParts };
+
+  BugType BugTypes[NumCheckerParts] = {
+      {this, PureChecker, "Pure virtual method call",
----------------
steakhal wrote:

Ok. I think the right phrase is "call to".

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/132072
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to